Categories: Litigation

Brevity is the Soul of Wit

As a litigator, it’s not often that I see a judge begin a District Court order by quoting Shakespeare; but reading the introduction in the Court’s Order in Sinclar v. Larson gave me the sneaking suspicion that this judge was about to make an example out of someone. This is not my case (thankfully), nevertheless, soon after the judge issued the order it found its way to my office, and I’m sure countless other attorneys’ offices – not to express a concept of law, but to emphasize an often-overlooked principle of legal writing: Brevity.

In the case, Sinclair’s attorney, who filed multiple briefs exceeding the 10-page limit without asking permission first, provoked Judge Taylor to take extreme action in striking 5 of Sinclair’s pending briefs. On the eve of trial, I can only imagine the impact of this order, which undoubtedly sent shivers down the spine of Sinclair’s lawyer. The order surely resulted in wasted attorney’s fees and court costs, and ultimately an unhappy client; and all because Sinclair’s briefs were not brief.

So, what can we learn from this Judge’s order?

First, prepare to get lambasted if you don’t follow the page limitations while practicing in front of Judge Taylor. Beyond that, however, I think there is a greater lesson. As quoted in the order, “brevity is an essential part of the art of advocacy.” Sinclair’s lengthy briefs, according to Judge Taylor, failed to preserve precious judicial resources. This judge, as with many judges, has over 300 other cases to manage, and he doesn’t have time to wade through unnecessary “legal fluff.”

Writing concisely is often easier said than done though; especially because litigation is complex and time is short. But effective advocates will find a way to produce briefs with clear and direct sentences that eliminate unnecessary words and phrases, remove redundancy, and apply the operative facts to the law. For your client’s sake, get to the point. The extra time it takes to produce quality briefs will make for better results and a happy client. Lastly, don’t take the court rules or the local rules lightly because some judges might actually enforce them.

Chad A. Kupper

Share
Published by
Chad A. Kupper

Recent Posts

NAVIGATING COLORADO’S HB24-1098: “FOR CAUSE” EVICITON LAW By Brian Allard, Lyons Gaddis

On April 19, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed HB24-1098 into law. The new law…

3 weeks ago

Why “putting your child on” your bank accounts probably isn’t the best plan.

When planning for the future, we all need to anticipate those times in life when…

2 months ago

Water Wars: Thornton’s Struggle and Triumph in Obtaining Pipeline Permits

By Jeffrey J. Kahn and Michelle R. Soule On May 8,2024 the City of Thornton…

6 months ago

Small Assets Create Big Headaches After Death

The smallest assets can create some of the biggest headaches when someone dies.  We often…

6 months ago

SECTION 211: A NEW TOOL FOR LANDOWNERS AND DEVELOPERS DEALING WITH PROBLEMATIC OIL AND GAS WELLS

Northern Colorado has been home to an abundance of oil and gas development and drilling…

7 months ago

ALERT FOR BUSINESS OWNERS: Federal Judge Puts CTA on Hold, but only for some

The Business Attorneys at Lyons Gaddis have been advising our clients to take a slow…

9 months ago