A permanent protection order was granted by county court, but the District Court reversed, stating there were insufficient contacts to establish jurisdiction over the non-resident husband. The Supreme Court considered whether and when a civil protection order is available to a victim of alleged domestic abuse who comes to Colorado seeking refuge from a non-resident partner.
The court concluded that an out-of-state party’s harassment of, threatening of, or attempt to coerce an individual known by the non-resident to be located in Colorado, is a tortious act sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction under the state’s long-arm statute, C.R.S. § 13-1-124. The court also concluded that such conduct creates a sufficient nexus between the out-of-state party and Colorado to satisfy the requisite minimum contacts such that the exercise of jurisdiction by a Colorado court to enter a protection order comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
As we move into the next phase of the May 6, 2025 regular special district…
Lyons Gaddis is proud to announce that attorney Jennifer Spitz was included on the 2025…
As Colorado's population grows and climate pressures increase, obtaining water supplies is one of the…
New Team Members Strengthen Government and Real Estate Law Practices Lyons Gaddis, a Colorado legal…
On Monday, February 10, 2024, the Department of Government Efficiency terminated 89 U.S. Department of Education…
The Trump Administration continues to express its priorities related to education with executive orders and…