A permanent protection order was granted by county court, but the District Court reversed, stating there were insufficient contacts to establish jurisdiction over the non-resident husband. The Supreme Court considered whether and when a civil protection order is available to a victim of alleged domestic abuse who comes to Colorado seeking refuge from a non-resident partner.
The court concluded that an out-of-state party’s harassment of, threatening of, or attempt to coerce an individual known by the non-resident to be located in Colorado, is a tortious act sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction under the state’s long-arm statute, C.R.S. § 13-1-124. The court also concluded that such conduct creates a sufficient nexus between the out-of-state party and Colorado to satisfy the requisite minimum contacts such that the exercise of jurisdiction by a Colorado court to enter a protection order comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
You may be concerned about taxes that will be due at your death. Before you…
Lyons Gaddis, known for solving complex issues with exceptional talent, is pleased to announce that…
Lyons Gaddis proudly recognizes Jeff Kahn for being named a Paul Harris Fellow by the…
On April 19, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed HB24-1098 into law. The new law…
When planning for the future, we all need to anticipate those times in life when…
Lyons Gaddis proudly celebrates Erin Pierce, a member of the firm’s General Civil Litigation and…