A permanent protection order was granted by county court, but the District Court reversed, stating there were insufficient contacts to establish jurisdiction over the non-resident husband. The Supreme Court considered whether and when a civil protection order is available to a victim of alleged domestic abuse who comes to Colorado seeking refuge from a non-resident partner.
The court concluded that an out-of-state party’s harassment of, threatening of, or attempt to coerce an individual known by the non-resident to be located in Colorado, is a tortious act sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction under the state’s long-arm statute, C.R.S. § 13-1-124. The court also concluded that such conduct creates a sufficient nexus between the out-of-state party and Colorado to satisfy the requisite minimum contacts such that the exercise of jurisdiction by a Colorado court to enter a protection order comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Lyons Gaddis, a Colorado legal firm known for solving complex issues and for its staff…
On Monday, January 20, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security issued a directive that rescinds…
January – February 2025 As we prepare for the May 2025 elections, here are the…
With the beginning of President Trump’s Administration and a recent federal court decision that vacated…
Expanding Expertise to Meet the Growing Legal Needs of Colorado’s Business and Real Estate Communities…
In the world of special districts, complex mapping, design, and engineering are part of daily…